Those who believe that global approach to advance the world on
environmental issues such as global warming and understand that economic
globalization will carry on developing our natural resources, may need
to readjust their thinking as a results of the lack of progress made on an
international level. They may better work with helping business in our
country achieve higher standards that will reflect globally on the
environment.

1) china refinement of oil and their standards

2) china’s use of this oil and their standards for carbon emissions

4) Obama administrations failure to achieve any results on negotiating
international carbon emission standards because of understanding you
have to verify with these people who run China as a business whose only concern is the bottom line. Although sadly the administration flip flops failing to address with legislation or even with their still purposed military plan a way to verify the amount of virus and pathogens the federal government is allowing them to dump in American waters delivering foreign made goods.  

3) oil sent to china with dirty water trail from lax ballast water regs
allowing bacteria, temperature activated virus, invasive s and toxic
substances to be spread along with the carbon footprint of tankers as the earth warms.

4) oil imported by tanker to replace this lost oil with dirty ballast trail and carbon footprint

5) possibly increase in coastal movement of this oil to California with dirty ballast and carbon footprint

6) shift of some dependence on supply from violent part of world to stable government of peace. This might not only help reduce war killing people but the environmental destruction war causes.

7) help American economy possibly cutting back on tainted China made goods
imported on ships with dirty ballast and carbon footprint
    
The NRDC has expressed dissatisfaction with the weak international ballast water regulation the EPA has purposed and there is still failure on the part of the Coast Guard to create strong action to put this problem to rest, all as the talk of New York strong regulations ending again begins to ramp up.

The above are a few things I think should to be considered by any
environmentalist who proclaims a global approach when considering where
this oil should go to best serve the global environment.