Gas Drilling – At What Price?

Dennis — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:32:47 +0000

From the Walton Reporter (no website), December 30, 2009.

(The following letter was sent to Colchester Supervisor Robert Homovich, the letter writer has informed The Walton Reporter and asked that it be printed here.)

Dear Mr. Homovich,

I am due to inherit land in Colchester, not far from Shinhopple, and I am deeply upset that you would permit the dangerous practice of hydrofracking in this valley. Horizontal drilling will introduce a mixture of toxic chemicals into billions of gallons of clean water, which must be sucked out of the Delaware River. It is a fairytale to think that none of these carcinogenic fluids will end up in our water supplies – killing fish, killing wildlife, killing livestock, and making our wells undrinkable. It’s happened in Colorado, it’s happened in Texas, it’s happened in Pennsylvania, and yes, it would happen here.

I am aware, as you yourself have said, that this region has relied on “harvesting it’s natural resources” to survive, but so far, Delaware County has been able to thrive in the midst of harvesting lumber and stone. Outside of the temporary disruption of trout fishing due to the Downsville dam at times, people come from all over to enjoy the river. Clean water, clean air and abundant wildlife have characterized this region. Hydrofracking requires the release of its toxic wastewater to continue production. Clean water must be continuously supplied, contaminated and then discarded. Now, where is all this toxic fluid going to go? Into our soil and into our water.

And, to top it off, the gas companies are not legally bound to clean up after themselves. Check your contract. They can trash your property and, with horizontal drilling, they can infiltrate all your neighbors’ properties and just walk away. They don’t answer to the 1974 Clean Water Act, they don’t answer to local authorities and they are too big and powerful to sue. The Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC) own spill reports document that existing regulations have not required the cleanup of hundreds of drill related incidents, including air pollution, explosions, polluted water wells, home evacuations due to unbearable noise levels and massive wastewater releases.

I have looked forward for almost 20 years to retiring to the beautiful Catskill region to hike, fish and spend my days, and my money, in peace. It truly sickens me to think my pristine property may become unlivable, uninsurable and impossible to sell! Please do not risk the lives and livelihood of so many for a temporary monetary profit that may not amount to much.

Patricia Rigby

LTE: Fairness – Gas-Drilling in the NYC Watershed

Dennis — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:11:06 +0000

Jack McShane, the letter writer, lives over this ridge.

From the Walton Reporter (no website), January 13, 2010.

(The following letter was sent to New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg. The letter writer has asked The Walton Reporter to publish it as well.)

Dear Mr. Bloomberg, et al,

I am writing from a small town called Andes in the Catskill Mountains, a place I call home and you and your constituents call your watershed. My wife and I are landowners here, having purchased 370 acres, some of it 24 years ago, and are planning to keep it as open space maintaining fields and forest. What I am writing to you about are two things, natural gas drilling and fairness.

I must preface what I am about to say with the fact that I am a conservationist and land steward and have been all my life. You may say after residing this that I want to have my cake and eat it too. Well, I wish I could, as I wish we all could, but I know better.

Natural gas drilling in the watershed is potentially a threat to the water that hydrates your constituency, some nine million people, myself and neighbors inhabiting the area. There have been many loud voices, including your own, the New York Times, and a myriad of others asking that gas drilling be prohibited by law. Never is there a word about fairness to the private landowners whose land ownership includes the mineral rights existing below that land.

These rights were deeded upon purchase of the land with hard earned dollars and also maintained continuously by the payment of very high town and school taxes, even though the open land which includes trees, streams and springs (which supply our water) need no infrastructure or schooling. Although unfair, I don’t mind paying these taxes, as I understand the societal need.

New York City’s nearly nine million inhabitants (your constituency) benefit from me and my neighbors keeping our lands open and undeveloped. Our land, along with state and city land, is the primary source of their clean unfiltered drinking water. I often wonder how many of these nine million people recognize this fact?

This is where the issue of fairness comes in to play. Let me say, first, that I am not asking for fairness, as I recognize that we live in a majoritarian democracy, and as one of our forebears said, “in a democracy the minority lives under the tyranny of the majority.” All I am asking for is a smidgeon of fairness and recognition by NYC and its inhabitants as to what private landowners in the watershed are doing – protecting their water supply by not developing, not bottling our precious water and selling it, both of which could be quite lucrative, and paying very high land taxes.

If this recognition of the need for fairness were to prevail, which is what I am asking you to do, it could be expressed by NYC paying at least 50 percent of our onerous land taxes. A very small amount added to the water usage fees would pay for this and help get users to realize the value of this commodity and, in turn, do more to conserve it.

I am fully aware of the DEP (New York City Department of Environmental Protection) Land Acquisition Program that purchases private land in fee and conservation easements on those lands in perpetuity. This program, to alleviate the pressure by the federal EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) to build a filtration plant saves NYC billions of dollars. I am also aware of the funding of the Catskill Watershed Corporation and the Watershed Agricultural Council by NYC, which, in effect, saves the city billions and protects against the loss of the Filtration Avoidance Determination by the EPA.

Conservation easements, with the City of New York looking over the shoulder of the landowner in perpetuity, are not for everybody, including myself.

Mayor Bloomberg, if you want to get your way with arbitrarily taking the inherent and paid for right of landowners to drill for natural gas, for the protection of clean water for your nine million constituents, I believe you should consider a smidgen of fairness by having them pay what would be a very small fee to the Catskill private landowners for what we are doing for them. Thank you for your attention.

Jack McShane

SierraActivist » Letter to the Editor

Gas Drilling – At What Price?

Related Posts

LTE: Fairness – Gas-Drilling in the NYC Watershed

Related Posts